T.S. Eliot's concept of tradition and individual talent.
T. S. Eliot explain his view on tradition and individual talent.
1) How would you like to explain Eliot's concept of tradition?do you agree with it?
Yes I am agree with his concept of tradition. He explain that the traditions has sense of traditional and he also view it with Modern. Tradition is a living monument. He also has actually means to a positive sense.
Eliot also speaking there is also a tension between somebody becomes traditional and somebody becomes modern. Modern means automatically good and tradisional means automatically not so good.
2)what do you understand by historical sense?
The historical sense involves a perception not only of pastness of past but it is presence, historical sense compels a man to writer not merely with his own generation in his bone but with feeling that the whole of the literature of Europe Frome Homer and within its whole literature compose a simultaneous order.
In the historical sense which is a sense of the timeless as well as the temporal and of the timeless and temporal together.
3) what is the relationship between tradition and individual talent according to the poet T.S. Eliot.
Tradition and individual talent explain Eliot that it gives poet or artist of any kind must always be measured in the relationship to a tradition of poet and artist. His significance his appears citation is the appreciation of his relation the dead poet and artist. Poet is not a passive recipient of tradition but actively engage with tradition to develop new work.
4) Explain:,some can absorb knowledge the more trady must sweat for it. Shakespeare acquire more essential history from Plutarch than most men could from the whole British museum.
Shakespeare had such a wide achary entire of section of character theme and idea in his work. He comes up with the answer he actually borrowing the thought of Arnold to function of criticism at present time.
Eliot demands from his poets that Shakespeare seems to be unexceptional because if hr says that every one has to be very well read every artist and then coming down to the modern reader.
5) Explain: Honest criticism and sensitive appreciation is diverted not upon the poet but poetry.
In this Eliot says that poet is not important in poetry. There is no sensitive appreciation is directed by poet but poetry. In to the reading of poetry there had not be any effect of poet. There is only requirements of poetry not poet.
6)How would you like to explain Eliot's theory of depersonalization?You can explain with the help of chemical reaction in presence of catalyst platinum.
Eliot shred of platinum and sulphuric acid . In this essay becomes very interesting because early 20th century it tries to bringing element of science and vigour of science to humanities and arts. Eliot refers to is the laboratory the formation of sulfuric acid. It is our H2So4 . It requires the ingredients sulfur trioxide so3 and water but what is great importance entire equation will not take place . In this use of Plato in our earlier units Plato thought on frenzy,Aristotle thought on making..Dryden also give his preface to 1) invention 2) fertility and 3) clothing.
Eliot says that science present knowledge but I.A. Richard explain how present arts through science.
7) Explain: "poetry is not a turning losse of emotions but an escape from emotion it is not the expression of personality but an escape from personality. "
In this Eliot says that poetry is just a powerful feeling..poet also keep hos emotion in poetry. It also not use of emotion and personal expression but explanation of poets mind and his imagination and feelings.
8)write two point on which one can write critique on T . S. Eliot as a critics.
To explain Eliot's theory as a critic
1)He gave the theory of individual talent and tradition. It gives a different view to point out the main theme of literary theory.
2) Eliot also give the viewpoint of sense and sensibility how can use of his greatness of people and writers. He also says that temporal pastness of past with presence.
1) How would you like to explain Eliot's concept of tradition?do you agree with it?
Yes I am agree with his concept of tradition. He explain that the traditions has sense of traditional and he also view it with Modern. Tradition is a living monument. He also has actually means to a positive sense.
Eliot also speaking there is also a tension between somebody becomes traditional and somebody becomes modern. Modern means automatically good and tradisional means automatically not so good.
2)what do you understand by historical sense?
The historical sense involves a perception not only of pastness of past but it is presence, historical sense compels a man to writer not merely with his own generation in his bone but with feeling that the whole of the literature of Europe Frome Homer and within its whole literature compose a simultaneous order.
In the historical sense which is a sense of the timeless as well as the temporal and of the timeless and temporal together.
3) what is the relationship between tradition and individual talent according to the poet T.S. Eliot.
Tradition and individual talent explain Eliot that it gives poet or artist of any kind must always be measured in the relationship to a tradition of poet and artist. His significance his appears citation is the appreciation of his relation the dead poet and artist. Poet is not a passive recipient of tradition but actively engage with tradition to develop new work.
4) Explain:,some can absorb knowledge the more trady must sweat for it. Shakespeare acquire more essential history from Plutarch than most men could from the whole British museum.
Shakespeare had such a wide achary entire of section of character theme and idea in his work. He comes up with the answer he actually borrowing the thought of Arnold to function of criticism at present time.
Eliot demands from his poets that Shakespeare seems to be unexceptional because if hr says that every one has to be very well read every artist and then coming down to the modern reader.
5) Explain: Honest criticism and sensitive appreciation is diverted not upon the poet but poetry.
In this Eliot says that poet is not important in poetry. There is no sensitive appreciation is directed by poet but poetry. In to the reading of poetry there had not be any effect of poet. There is only requirements of poetry not poet.
6)How would you like to explain Eliot's theory of depersonalization?You can explain with the help of chemical reaction in presence of catalyst platinum.
Eliot shred of platinum and sulphuric acid . In this essay becomes very interesting because early 20th century it tries to bringing element of science and vigour of science to humanities and arts. Eliot refers to is the laboratory the formation of sulfuric acid. It is our H2So4 . It requires the ingredients sulfur trioxide so3 and water but what is great importance entire equation will not take place . In this use of Plato in our earlier units Plato thought on frenzy,Aristotle thought on making..Dryden also give his preface to 1) invention 2) fertility and 3) clothing.
Eliot says that science present knowledge but I.A. Richard explain how present arts through science.
7) Explain: "poetry is not a turning losse of emotions but an escape from emotion it is not the expression of personality but an escape from personality. "
In this Eliot says that poetry is just a powerful feeling..poet also keep hos emotion in poetry. It also not use of emotion and personal expression but explanation of poets mind and his imagination and feelings.
8)write two point on which one can write critique on T . S. Eliot as a critics.
To explain Eliot's theory as a critic
1)He gave the theory of individual talent and tradition. It gives a different view to point out the main theme of literary theory.
2) Eliot also give the viewpoint of sense and sensibility how can use of his greatness of people and writers. He also says that temporal pastness of past with presence.
Comments
Post a Comment